Thursday, October 10, 2013

With New Abortion Restrictions, Ohio Walks a Narrow Legal Line

With New Abortion Restrictions, Ohio Walks a Narrow Legal Line


CLEVELAND — Angela H., married with two children, became pregnant accidentally and, after medical complications during her last pregnancy and severe postpartum depression, said neither she nor her family was ready for another child.
Under a law that took effect in Ohio this month, the Cleveland abortion clinic she visited had to offer her a chance not only to view an ultrasound of the fetus but also to watch its beating heart, which she said she resented.
“It’s a hard decision for anybody to make,” she said of abortion, asking that her surname not be published out of privacy concerns. “To make it more difficult by passing these laws and making women feel guilty is terrible.”
Ohio has become a laboratory for what anti-abortion leaders call the incremental strategy — passing a web of rules designed to push the hazy boundaries of Supreme Court guidelines without flagrantly violating them. Many of the rules, critics say, are designed to discourage women from getting abortions or to hamper clinic operations, even forcing some to close. 
The mandated discussion of fetal heartbeats is one of a cascade of abortion restrictions adopted in Ohio over the years, from a waiting period to curbs on the medication-induced abortions preferred by many women. The pace has quickened since John R. Kasich became governor in 2011, cementing Republican domination of state politics. Avowedly anti-abortion, Mr. Kasich said through a spokesman that he considered the restrictions he signed this year “reasonable.”
These laws have passed without the national drama provoked by far-reaching abortion bans that were approved, then overturned in court, in states like Arkansas and North Dakota. But taken together, they affect patients and clinics in myriad ways — in the view of the laws’ proponents, rightly making women think twice before ending a pregnancy and ensuring clinic safety or, in the view of opponents, imposing heartless obstacles and guilt on women who are seeking a legal procedure.
“In Ohio, the last few years have been fantastic if you support the pro-life movement,” said Mike Gonidakis, the president of Ohio Right to Life. His group has even lobbied against a more sweeping ban on early-term abortions, incurring the wrath of more restless abortion foes. But he says, “We’ve been able to craft pro-life laws that can withstand court scrutiny.”
On Wednesday, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a challenge in state court to the heartbeat mandate and other new restrictions, asserting that they were adopted in violation of the Ohio Constitution’s “single subject” rule because they were part of an unrelated budget bill.
More broadly, abortion-rights advocates call the incremental strategy, which has been refined by several national groups and pursued in a number of states, an insidious way to limit access to abortion and shame women who in many cases already have to walk past shouting protesters to enter clinics.
“If you can’t outlaw abortion outright, just make it harder and harder to get,” said Chrisse France, the executive director of Preterm, a large nonprofit abortion clinic on the East Side of Cleveland that performs about 4,900 abortions a year, mainly for low-income women. “They say they’re doing this to protect women’s health, but some of the laws are actually harmful, and some are just cruel.”
Conversations with patients at Preterm revealed diverse reactions to the mandated waiting period and counseling, but no sign that any women were changing course.
Madelyn Puterbaugh, 23, said that her birth control had failed and that it was “not the right time” for her to bear a child. She said she had turned down the chance to view the fetal heartbeat. “I didn’t look,” she said. “I thought I’d be too sad.”
She went ahead with the abortion, but said she had not minded the required 24-hour wait between the counseling and the procedure. “They gave me a lot to think about,” she said, “but it’s my choice.”
Ohio has long required abortion clinics to have a formal transfer agreement with a nearby hospital for emergency care, something physicians say is medically unnecessary because hospitals are required to treat emergency patients. Now, a new measure bars public hospitals from signing such agreements — a shift that could force two or three of the state’s remaining 11 clinics to close because they cannot find willing partners. 
Other measures wrapped into the state budget bill this year, and signed by Governor Kasich, include a requirement that women seeking an abortion be told the probable odds that their pregnancy would go to full term if they changed their minds; a diversion of federal welfare money to so-called crisis pregnancy centers; new financing for rape-crisis centers on the condition that they provide no abortion referrals; and a tightening of parental consent requirements for minors.  
To avoid passing money to Planned Parenthood, the state also ended competitive bidding for federal family planning grants, giving priority to public agencies. As a result, some nonprofit women’s health centers that have no connection to Planned Parenthood or abortion also face drastic cuts.
The newest rules follow a flurry of changes in 2011, when, among other things, the state banned abortions, except to save the mother’s life, once the fetus is viable. Fearing potential criminal charges, clinic doctors around the state have stopped performing abortions beyond the 22nd week of pregnancy, even in cases involving severe birth defects or serious medical conditions.
Since a federal court allowed it here in 2011 after years of litigation, Ohio has been the only state to require what doctors call an outdated, less safe and less effective regimen for medication abortions.
The law mandates adherence to the original Food and Drug Administration approval, which called for three times the drug dosage now standard and authorized the method only through seven weeks of pregnancy. As a result, while later studies showed them to be safe through nine weeks, medication abortions can no longer be offered in the eighth and ninth weeks of pregnancy.
Similar restrictions on medication abortion were passed this year in Texas and are under court challenge; they have been voided as unconstitutional barriers in North Dakota and in Oklahoma, which is seeking a review by the Supreme Court.
At Preterm, the annual number of nonsurgical abortions plummeted to 90 in 2012 from more than 600 in earlier years. But “there’s no evidence that this cut down on abortion,” said Ms. France, the clinic director. “Women just said, ‘Never mind, I’ll get a surgical abortion.’ ”
In Ohio, as elsewhere, abortions have declined over all in recent years, although there was a slight uptick to 25,473 reported procedures in 2012, with black women accounting for a growing share. Whether the new laws have significantly reduced the numbers or simply made abortions more fraught is disputed.
Mr. Gonidakis, of Ohio Right to Life, said he felt sure the measures had persuaded many women to change their minds and predicted that even more, when confronted with the fetal heartbeat and other information, would do so in the future.
“There are so many families waiting to adopt,” he added, offering an alternative that crisis pregnancy centers and others are increasingly promoting.
In the coming months, Mr. Gonidakis said, his organization plans to focus its lobbying on the easing of state adoption rules and an increase in tax breaks for adoptive parents.
But other anti-abortion groups and conservative legislators are pressing ahead with a proposal to ban abortion altogether once a fetal heartbeat is detectable, as early as six weeks into pregnancy

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Reading Health Information